#CSOs, Advocacy, Climate Change, Renewable Energy, SDGS

JOINT STATEMENT BY AFRICAN AND EUROPEAN CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS

Leave a comment

Joint Statement by African and European Civil Society Organizations

On the Occasion of the AU–EU Foreign Ministers Meeting, 21 May 2025

Summary for decision-makers

African and European civil society organizations urge the AU-EU Foreign Ministers Meeting to deliver a bold, equitable roadmap for climate justice, energy transition, and green industrialisation. Ministers must commit to enhanced 1.5°C-aligned NDCs, scaled-up adaptation and loss and damage support, and accelerated implementation of SDG7 and the COP28 global energy targets—tripling renewables, doubling energy efficiency, and transitioning away from fossil fuels.

We call on the AU and EU to:

  1. commit to delivering on the Paris Agreement, SDG7, and global energy goals by scaling up renewables, doubling energy efficiency, phasing out fossil fuels, and advancing just, inclusive, and locally driven energy transitions aligned with national priorities;
  2. commit to urgently reforming the global financial and economic systems, prioritizing fair access to funding and debt justice for African countries, implementing recommendations for debt relief, and unlocking affordable financing for clean energy projects;
  3. commit to a fossil-free future by ending public support for fossil fuel investments, redirecting funds toward renewable energy, regulating the private sector to align with the Paris Agreement, and halting the promotion of fossil gas, including LNG as a transition fuel;
  4. commit to significantly increasing support for adaptation and loss and damage in Africa by boosting grant-based funding for climate resilience sectors, aligning initiatives with African priorities, and ensuring predictable funding for the Loss and Damage Fund;
  5. commit to transforming African economies through green industrialization by promoting local manufacturing, skills development, technology transfer, and fair value chain participation, ensuring Africa benefits from its natural resources, drives green jobs, and leads the global energy transition.

Full Statement

As civil society organizations from Africa and Europe, we welcome the upcoming AU-EU Foreign Ministers Meeting as a crucial opportunity to reaffirm a just and transformative partnership between our continents. We urge ministers to clearly commit to strengthening multilateralism through ambitious climate action — including enhanced efforts to achieve the 1.5°C limit of the Paris Agreement. This must involve the development and timely submission of ambitious third-generation Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) before the UN Summit of the Future in September, alongside scaled-up adaptation efforts, meaningful progress on addressing loss and damage, and the delivery of SDG 7: ensuring universal access to affordable, reliable, sustainable energy by 2030. Ministers must also commit to implementing the global energy targets agreed at COP28: tripling renewable energy capacity, doubling energy efficiency by 2030, and transitioning away from fossil fuels by 2050. An equitable approach to the fossil fuel phase out demands that the EU phase out coal by 2030, gas by 2035, and oil by 2040, reflecting its greater historical responsibility and capacity, while recognizing and supporting the leadership of African countries, whose energy systems already feature significant shares of renewables and who require international support to expand clean energy access without replicating fossil-dependent pathways.

We acknowledge the EU’s stated ambitions—particularly those outlined in the Global Gateway strategy—to support Africa’s green transition. However, we are concerned that this partnership is becoming overly eurocentric and export-oriented, and does not respond sufficiently to climate impacts. Africa must not remain a mere supplier of resources for Europe’s energy transition. Local value creation, resilient infrastructure, transformation of local economies, and energy access for all must be at the heart of all energy investments. Support for adaptation, particularly locally led approaches, and to address loss and damage must also be scaled up.

The AU-EU Foreign Ministers Meeting, including its roundtables on “multilateralism” and on “prosperity” are a vital opportunity to reflect on how the AU and EU can defend and strengthen international climate cooperation, and accelerate the socio-economic benefits  in the intersections between energy, infrastructure, climate, and digital transformation. We call for meaningful dialogue during this session around the implementation of SDG 7 and the global energy goals, with a strong emphasis on justice, inclusion, resilience and sustainability. It is essential that these discussions move beyond extractive investment models and embrace approaches that foster African ownership, skills development, and technology transfer.

Our Expectations for the Meeting’s Communiqué:

  1. The AU and EU must commit to delivering on the Paris Agreement, Agenda 2030/SDG7 and Global Energy Goals:

Member states of both blocks are critical signatories to the Paris Agreement, and have committed to put 1.5°C aligned NDCs on the table. Committing to deliver enhanced NDCs integrated with economy wide just transition policies and plans  can ensure that decarbonization strategies create decent work, protect labour and Indigenous rights, promote gender justice, and address social and environmental impacts. The communiqué must explicitly endorse the global goals of tripling renewable energy capacity, doubling energy efficiency, and transitioning away from fossil fuels, while ensuring alignment with national and regional development priorities in Africa. The EU and AU must jointly prioritize the rapid and ambitious scaling-up of renewable energy to enable a swift transition away from fossil fuels and tackle the devastating energy poverty that continues to affect much of the African continent. This must be done in full alignment with the SDGs and the principle of a just transition. Furthermore, both the EU and AU must prioritize decentralized, community-based energy solutions that build local capacity and resilience within African societies. At the same time, energy efficiency must be recognized as a critical enabler of this transition, with the EU reducing existing energy demand: the greater the efficiency gains, the lower the demand for new energy, and the faster the phase-out of fossil fuels.

  1. The AU and EU must highlight the importance of an urgent reform of global financial and economic systems to ensure equitable and effective climate action, prioritizing fair access to funding and debt justice for African countries:

A key precondition for the necessary investments in sustainable development and clean energy is coordinated debt relief by all creditors, especially for highly vulnerable economies. This is essential for enabling Global South countries to meet the 2030 Agenda, uphold the Paris Agreement, and fulfil human rights obligations. The EU and AU should commit to supporting and implementing recommendations from expert bodies such as the Expert Review on Debt, Nature and Climate (co-led by Kenya), the Debt Jubilee Commission, and the African Expert Panel on Cost of Capital (led by South Africa). These recommendations—though still being consolidated—already offer valuable proposals for delivering short-term debt relief. Structural reform must include a UN Framework Convention on Sovereign Debt to fix persistent flaws in the global debt architecture and ensure timely, fair crisis resolution.

Simultaneously, access to finance and  renewable energy technologies remains a major barrier—particularly for African communities and small enterprises. The distorted cost of capital, with much higher interest rates in developing countries, and concentration of renewable energy technologies in developed countries  hinders a just energy transition. Funding and technology transfer mechanisms must enable direct, affordable access, especially for small- and medium-scale projects. This requires more grants and concessional finance, better risk mitigation, and the removal of non-tariff trade barriers, geopolitical or commercial conditionalities. Crucially, this also requires comprehensive regulatory reforms on the ground to reduce investment risk and build investor confidence. The financial power of the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the technological capacity of the EU member states should be strategically deployed to support these reforms and to unlock greater investment in Africa’s clean energy future.

The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) adopted at COP29 calls for the scaling up of financing to developing country Parties to at least USD 1.3 trillion per year by 2035  with developed countries leading on a goal of at least USD 300 billion per year. A linear pathway from the current USD 100 billion implies contributions must double by 2030 and triple by 2035. EU budget contributions should be scaled up, through a bigger external action budget governed by a 50% climate and environment spending target. Global Gateway initiatives would benefit from greater transparency, should support country and community ownership, target high risk and hard to decarbonise sectors of the economy and deliver positive development impacts to ensure additionality.

To further mobilize resources, innovative financing mechanisms must be explored—such as taxes on aviation and shipping, taxing ultra-high-net-worth individuals, and repurposing fossil fuel subsidies. The EU and AU must jointly commit to structural financial reforms, progressive taxation, and strengthening the UN’s role in global tax governance.

  1. The EU and AU must take a clear, united stance against fossil fuel investments:

The EU must urgently end public support for fossil fuels, including support provided through development banks and export credit agencies (ECAs), and redirect them toward renewable energy, aligning with just transition principles and avoiding socially regressive impacts. Public spending, including subsidies and investments, must be explicitly prohibited from supporting fossil fuel infrastructure, including production, processing, distribution, storage, and combustion of fossil fuels.  Additionally, the EU and AU should adequately regulate the private financial sector to align with the goals of the Paris Agreement. This means not only offering “green incentives” but also introducing stringent safeguards and penalties for climate-damaging activities. The EU and AU must commit to a fossil-free future, ensuring that all investments support a just and sustainable energy transition.

The continued promotion of fossil gas, including liquefied natural gas (LNG), as “transition fuels” is particularly concerning. This misrepresents gas as a path to energy security while displacing cleaner solutions and exposing countries to long-term economic and environmental harm. Large, export-oriented LNG projects in African countries—often backed by European actors—are primarily designed to serve foreign markets, while failing to expand access to affordable and reliable energy for local populations and contradicting global climate commitments. Critically, to align with their climate commitments the EU must phase out gas by 2035, meaning it will no longer import African LNG in the near future. This makes new LNG investments economically unviable, risking stranded assets and wasted resources.

  1. The EU must significantly increase its support for adaptation and loss and damage in Africa—both within its current budget cycle and in the upcoming 2028–2035 financial framework:

This includes substantial increases in grant-based funding for critical sectors that underpin climate resilience in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LICs and LMICs), such as water, climate-resilient infrastructure, health, sanitation and hygiene, agroecology, equitable food systems, and nature-based solutions that protect and restore ecosystems.

All adaptation investments must be grounded in the Principles for Locally Led Adaptation (LLA) to ensure that resources reach the most affected communities and reflect their knowledge systems and priorities. EU-supported initiatives—such as the Global Gateway—must strengthen mainstreaming of adaptation and disaster risk reduction by aligning with African countries’ National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), NDCs, and wider development strategies. The EU must also provide increased support to African-owned and -led initiatives at local, national, and continental levels.

On the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), the EU must play a constructive role at COP30 by pushing for an operational framework backed by clear and equitable Means of Implementation—including finance, technology transfer, and capacity-building—so that GGA targets are not only aspirational but achievable for vulnerable countries.

In terms of loss and damage, the EU should commit new and additional resources to the Loss and Damage Fund, ensure predictable and ongoing funding, and promote direct access for affected communities. Furthermore, the EU and AU should jointly advocate for strong L&D finance in the Baku–Belém roadmap, support the establishment of a permanent L&D agenda item at COPs, and promote the launch of a UNEP-hosted Loss and Damage Gap Report as part of the WIM review process.

  1. The EU-AU communiqué must chart a bold course for Africa’s economic transformation through green industrialization, ensuring the continent fully benefits from its natural resources and plays a central role in the global energy transition:

Africa holds many of the critical minerals needed for clean technologies, yet these are often exported unprocessed, limiting local economic development and job creation. In 2020, Africa had an export worth of $457 billion—mainly raw materials—while importing $627 billion worth of high-value goods, reinforcing a persistent trade deficit. To even out this imbalance, the EU and AU must commit to local manufacturing, skills development, technology transfer, and fair participation across the green industrial value chain. This is vital for industrial resilience, climate and economic justice, and reducing global inequality.

The development of green value chain components for the energy transition, combined with regional integration, provides promising opportunities for African green industrialisation. Partnerships like the Clean Trade and Investment Partnership (CTIP) can support these goals—but must not become tools for securing Europe’s access to raw materials at the cost of African communities. CTIP should instead advance local value creation, green jobs, and technology transfer, while prioritizing Africa’s energy and development needs.

Particular caution is needed around the growing emphasis on hydrogen. Terms like “low-carbon hydrogen,” as seen in the South Africa-EU CTIP, risk enabling fossil-based hydrogen under a misleading label. This undermines Africa’s transition and risks locking in fossil infrastructure. Hydrogen initiatives must be grounded in energy additionality, ensuring renewable power used is new and surplus, not diverted from essential local use.

All EU-AU trade and industrial initiatives must be guided by equity, sustainability, and sovereignty, enabling Africa to lead in clean energy, green manufacturing, and climate-resilient growth on its own terms.

 

As civil society organizations from both continents, we reaffirm our commitment to being active partners in shaping a just transition. Our voices must be heard and included in decision-making processes to ensure that the outcomes of this partnership serve people and the planet—not profit.

 

Signed and supported by:

Wafa Misrar, Campaigns and Policy Lead, Climate Action Network Africa

Sven Harmeling, Head of Climate, Climate Action Network Europe

Sherpard Zvigadza, Coordinator, Climate Action Network Southern African Region

Dr. Christiane Averbeck, Executive Director, Klima-Allianz Deutschland

Christoph Bals, Chief Policy Officer, Germanwatch

Dean Bhebhe, Senior Just Transitions Advisor, Power Shift Africa

Toni Hancox, Director, Legal Assistance Centre

Carin Karl Atondé, Directeur Exécutif, ONG JVE Bénin

Carin Karl Atondé, Coordonnateur, RODER Bénin

Magda Stoczkiewicz, Programme Director, Greenpeace European Unit

Malam Issa Rabiou, Coordinateur National, CONDER – NIGER

Smith Nwokocha, Coordinator, Quest For Growth and Development Foundation

Laetitia Hema, Project Manager, Centre d’études et d’expérimentations économiques et sociales de l’Afrique de l’Ouest-Association

Sena Alouka, Directeur Exécutif, ONG Jeunes Volontaires pour l’Environnement

Gladys Kiplagat, Executive Director, Baringo Indigenous Peoples ‘ Organization

Tshepiso Masilonyane, Programs Manager, Botswana Climate Change Network

Endashaw Mogessie Tiruneh, Executive Director, Population, Health and Environment Ethiopia Consortium

Karine Sohet, Senior Policy Officer, ACT Alliance EU

Tobias Holle, CEO, Shifting Advocacy

Imali Ngusal, Strategic & Technical Lead, The African Center for Health, Climate & Gender Justice Alliance

Ireen Twongirwe, Executive Director, Women for Green Economy Movement Uganda

Wellington Madumira, National coordinator, Climate Action Network Zimbabwe

Nadia Hmaity, Président, Association LaSiesta pour la protection de l’environnement

Umar Adamu, Director, Centre For Muslim Youth In Peace and Development

Nurideen Abdulai, Executive Director, Africa Center for Energy and Environmental Sustainability

Thabo Sibeko, Senior Programs Manager, Earthlife Africa Jhb

Prince Israel Orekha, Executive Director, Connected Advocacy

Jeroom Remmers, Director, TAPP Coalition

Kenneth Nana Amoateng, Executive Director, AbibiNsroma Foundation

Mr. Maimoni Ubrei-Joe, Director of Campaigns and Administration, Community Development Advocacy Foundation

Jeremie Fosse, Director, Eco-Union

Smith Nwokocha, Coordinator, Quest For Growth and Development Foundation

Paul van den Berg, Political Advisor, Cordaid

Heba Momtaz, CO-FOUNDER, Nawah Eco-Feminist Environmental Network in Egypt

Thato Gabaitse, Director, We The World Botswana

Mikhail Aruberito, Knowledge and Learning Officer, The Shine Collab

Edem Yaovi Dadzie, Executive Director, Afrique Eco 2100

Hilde Stroot, Policy Lead Climate Justice & Just Energy Transition Coordinator, Oxfam

Abdulhamid Tahir Hamid, President, African Union Commission Great Green Wall Youth Advisory Board

Abdulhamid Tahir Hamid, CEO, Global Environmental and Climate Conservation Initiative

Angelina Ungianumbeye Ugben, Executive Director, Global Disabilities Green Initiative

Nne Umoren, Coordinator, Green leaf Advocacy and Empowerment Center

Edwin Mumbere, Director, Centre for Citizens Conserving Environment & Management

Ini Usanga, CEO, Love and Care for People CLG

Dr Eseoghene Okparavero-Agbatutu, Founder/CEO,  Maden Healthcare Foundation

Ejit Josiah, Program Manager, Rights Advocacy and Development Centre

Kabine Doumbia, Executive Director, NGO ASRAD MALI

Malven Daka, Director, Vostile Creatives Trust

Amos Wemanya, Senior Strategist, Africa Common Transitions Agenda

Abubakar Saidu Midala, President, Youth Ambassador Democracy

Ali Abbas Abdeldjalil, Secrétaire Général, Association Donya des protecteurs de l’environnement a chlef

Adam Khalid Muhammad, Director, Sustain Humanity Organization Nigeria

John Lufukaribu Toly, Défenseur Local de l’Environnement, FORED-ONG en RD Congo

Thulisile Maziya, Executive Director, Sinatsisa Lubombo Women and Girls Empowerment Organization

Maria Klatte, Head of Africa Department, & Kathrin Schroeder, Head of Policy and Global Challenges,Misereor

Bodhisattva Gupta, Fundraising Director, Greenpeace Africa

Fran Witt, Programme Director, Recourse

 

Advocacy, Security

PRESS RELEASE

Leave a comment

                                                                                        28th April, 2025

ACCOUNT FOR THE DEAD, ENSURE JUSTICE FOR MASS ATROCITIES, AND PROTECT VULNERABLE COMMUNITIES IN BENUE AND PLATEAU STATES

“The security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of the government.”

 

Section 14(2)(b) CFRN 1999 (as amended)

 

The Community of Practice Against Mass Atrocities, under the auspices of Nigeria Mourns, strongly condemn the recent brutal and coordinated attacks on agrarian communities in Benue and Plateau States, which have led to the loss of at least 183 lives in the third week of April 2025 alone.

 

These attacks, perpetrated by criminal groups often mischaracterized as herders in conflict with farmers over land and water, are nothing short of acts of terror against vulnerable communities. In Benue State, at least 11 people were killed in Akpa, Otukpo Local Government Area (LGA); 56 others were killed in Logo and Ukum LGAs, with similar atrocities reported in Agatu, Kwande, and Katsina-Ala. At least 54 people were killed in Zikke village, Bassa LGA of Plateau State, in addition to 52 others killed in six other villages within Bokkos LGA, Plateau State, in yet another targeted onslaught. Eyewitnesses have confirmed the presence of armed assailants in Tyolough, Ukum LGA, further aggravating fears of continued violence.

 

The way and manner these attacks are undertaken leaves no doubt that they are not isolated incidents. It reflects a long-standing, systemic failure to address a crisis that has devastated agrarian communities for years. From 2019 to 2024, at least 2,105 Nigerians were killed in similar attacks across Nigeria. The frequency, coordination, lethality and impunity with which these attacks are carried out speak volumes about the Nigerian state’s inability or unwillingness to fulfill its constitutional duty as clearly provided in Section 14(2)(b) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).

 

These victims, men, women, children, and the elderly, were killed in their sleep, on their farms, and in their homes. Their only “crime” was residing in rural communities in a country increasingly defined by insecurity as a characteristic of the neglect of the rural areas by the Nigerian government.

 

This brazen disregard for human life violates Section 33(1) of the Nigerian Constitution, which guarantees every citizen the right to life. The continued erosion of this right is a stain on our collective conscience as Nigerians.

 

It is the responsibility of the government to resolve the longstanding land use crises across the country. These crises are not merely about ownership or access, they are deeply tied to identity, survival, and economic control. In Plateau and Benue States, and indeed across other parts of the country, these land disputes are further complicated by mining-related land grabs, where lands historically used for agriculture or habitation are being appropriated for extractive activities without the free, prior, and informed consent of local communities. The ongoing violence cannot be divorced from these systemic issues. Ignoring these root causes will only perpetuate the cycle of bloodshed.

We are deeply disturbed by the federal government’s inaction, especially when juxtaposed with the swiftness with which it addresses less consequential political matters elsewhere. This selective urgency further erodes public trust and confidence.

 

We call on the Government to:

  1. Allow for an independent investigation into all reported attacks to ensure the prosecution of perpetrators without bias or delay, through the instrumentality of the National Human Rights Commission and the United Nations Human Rights Council.

  2. Strengthen security deployment in high-risk areas, with special attention to early warning and rapid response systems.

  3. Deploy the Nigerian Air Force for aerial surveillance and raids, with real-time feeds shared publicly to expose the true nature of the assailants or their conspirators.

  4. Initiate coordinated ground operations across affected states to reclaim and secure the lands taken over from the agrarian communities in the affected states.

  5. Introduce and fund drone surveillance systems in collaboration with state governments to monitor and preempt attacks.

  6. Put in the framework for compensation of victims’ families, and build commemorative monuments to honor their memory.

  7. Support the formation of community-led safety watches (community security) to bolster local response capabilities.

Our thoughts and prayers remain with the bereaved families and displaced communities. We stand in solidarity with all victims of mass atrocities and reiterate that every Nigerian life matters.

The government must act decisively now, not just to restore peace, but to preserve its own legitimacy, as enshrined in Section 14(2)(b) of the Constitution.

As a coalition of committed civil society organizations, Nigeria Mourns will continue to amplify the voices of the vulnerable and demand justice on their behalf.

 

Signed by:

Advocacy Centre for Development (AC4D)

Alliances for Africa

Almajiri Child Rights Initiative (ACRI)

All-4-One Humanity Development Foundation

African Initiative for Peace Building, Advocacy and Advancement (AfriPeace)

Bauchi Human Rights Network

The Benue We Deserve Foundation (BenDeF)

Capacity Catalyst Consult (Triple C)

Centre for the Advocacy of Justice and Rights

Center for Community Excellence

Centre for Democracy and Development

Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC)

Global Rights

Grassroots Development Monitoring and Advocacy Centre GDMAC

Human Rights Network

Initiative for Social Development in Africa (iSODAF)

Mowalek Centre for Sustainable Community Development,

Neighbourhood Environment Watch Foundation

Sesor Empowerment Foundation

Srarina Initiative for Peace, Justice and Development

We the People

 

 

Climate Change, Oil and Gas, Renewable Energy, SDGS, Youth

PRESS RELEASE FOR GLOBAL DAYS OF ACTION FOR CLIMATE JUSTICE

Leave a comment

By Smith Nwokocha

November 15, 2024

Thousands join global rallies to demand climate finance, fossil fuel phase out during COP29

More than 150 actions held in 24 countries.

Thousands of people joined protest actions around the world today urging world leaders at the COP29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan to deliver a new climate finance goal and a rapid phase out of fossil fuels. Over 150 coordinated mass actions took place in more than 30 cities and provinces in 26 countries across the world, including a mobilisation in Baku. 

We will be having a rally at Ogbunabali Community today, championed by Quest For Growth and Development Foundation with support from Asian people’s Movement on Debt and Development (APMDD) , as well as Climate Action Network International (CAN Int’l) and we will mobilize youths, Community members, Women and students and also engage major Financial Institutions in the Community to ensure they stop financing Fossil Fuels Projects and ensure the Phaseout of Fossil Fuels and embrace Renewable Energy Transition Plus ensuring Climate Finance!

The rallies called on COP29 to strike a deal on a climate finance goal that would unlock trillions of funding for developing countries’ adaptation and mitigation actions and be able to transition to renewable energy systems. They specifically called for the delivery of climate finance of at least $5 trillion annually and reparations for climate debt, emphasising that the new climate finance goal should be based on the actual needs of developing countries for climate action and the just transition of communities dependent on fossil fuels.

The rallies further called for a rapid and equitable phaseout of fossil fuels and a direct transition to 100 percent renewable energy, stating that developed countries, those with the biggest historical emissions, have the responsibility to deliver a fair and funded phase out of fossil fuels, stating that developed countries have the means to mobilise trillions of dollars for urgent climate action domestically and internationally by ending fossil fuel subsidies, making big polluters pay, taxing the mega-rich, and stopping funding for war and militarism.

At COP28, governments have committed to transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems with developed countries taking the lead. COP29 is considered as crucial in unlocking the climate finance needed to enable a just transition away from fossil fuels. So far, most climate finance that has been delivered were loans, not grants, blocking climate action and exacerbating debt distress in many developing countries. Almost 70 percent of the $91 billion in public climate finance provided in 2022 was in the form of loans.

The 29th UNFCCC’s Conference of Parties or COP29 is taking place from November 11 – 22 in Baku, Azerbaijan. Nations negotiating at COP29 are expected to agree on a New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) for climate finance from the goal of $100 billion per year by 2020, a deadline which developed countries missed.

Under the Paris Agreement, governments agreed to set an ambitious new climate finance goal by 2025. The scale of finance needed is significant, according to global models from $1.55 trillion to $5.8 trillion to $13.6 trillion annually by 2030.

Climate finance is also seen as key to unlocking more ambition from countries. Early next year, countries will submit their updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), which outline climate actions to reduce national emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. Instead of phasing out fossil fuels, governments, in aggregate, still plan to produce  more than  double the amount of fossil fuels in 2030 than what would be consistent with limiting global warming to  1.5°C.

The 2024 Global Coal Exit List (GCEL) shows that 40% of coal companies worldwide are still developing new power plants, thermal coal mines, or coal infrastructure and that 95% of the coal industry has not set a date for ending the coal business. Meanwhile, new oil and gas exploration licences issued this year in 2024 threaten to generate the highest level of emissions since those issued in 2018. The US and the UK lead wealthy countries planning fossil fuel expansion in spite of their climate commitments. Fossil fuel firms are also investing more money into developing new oil and gas sites than at any time since the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015.

NOTES:

  • In Asia, mobilizations were held in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Pakistan, Malaysia, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Japan
  • In Africa, mobilizations were held in Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Benin Republic, Burkina Faso, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, and Rwanda
  • In Europe, mobilizations were held in Greece, UK, Italy

 

 

 

#CSOs, Advocacy, SDGS, Youth

GLOBAL RIGHT NIGERIA CALL FOR INVESTIGATION OF THE MISCONDUCT OF RIMAZONTE EZEKIEL

Leave a comment

By Global Right Nigeria

To the Chairman, Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee,

We write to bring to your attention the conduct of Mr. Rimazonte Ezekiel, whose recent actions have cast a serious shadow over the legal profession in Nigeria. Mr. Ezekiel, who represented the Federal Government in the recent case involving minors arraigned before Justice Obiara Egwuatu for participating in the #EndBadGovernance protests, made blatantly false statements to the media in a manner that has shocked both the public and the legal community.

In a widely circulated interview, Mr. Ezekiel claimed that the minors who fainted in court due to evident malnourishment and mistreatment were not children but adults. He further alleged that these minors were “married men” and “university graduates.” Such cynical and malicious misrepresentation of facts, aimed at undermining the plight of children, is conduct unbecoming of someone who has earned the privilege of being called to the Nigerian Bar. Mr. Ezekiel’s statements, now widely shared on social media, have justifiably drawn public outrage and ridicule, with many Nigerians viewing his actions as emblematic of the legal profession in Nigeria. This cannot be allowed to stand.

The rationale for Mr. Ezekiel’s conduct is both disturbing and clear. On 1 November 2024, Nigerians and observers around the world witnessed the shocking scene in a federal courtroom, where several visibly malnourished minors collapsed from hunger. This court, intended to serve as a hallowed hall of justice, was instead a site of injustice and tragedy. In an apparent attempt to shield the government from criticism, Mr. Ezekiel fabricated an account, claiming that “most of them are married men” and alleging that “the small kids” were simply “visiting loved ones in court.” The absurdity of these claims was so pronounced that two other lawyers present during the interview were visibly amused.

While public statements to the media are not under oath, legal practitioners are required by the ethics of their profession to at all times maintain high standards of honesty and integrity. Section 1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners requires that: “A lawyer shall uphold

and observe the rule of law, promote and foster the course of justice, maintain a high standard of professional conduct, and shall not engage in any conduct which is unbecoming of a legal practitioner.” Furthermore, Section 30 states, “A lawyer is an officer of the Court, and accordingly, he shall not do any act or conduct himself in a manner that may obstruct, delay, or adversely

affect the administration of justice.” Mr. Ezekiel’s attempt to frame minors as adults in order to justify their continued detention and maltreatment constitutes a gross violation of these standards and reflects a severe lapse in ethical judgment.

Deeply troubled by what we saw and concerned for the image of the legal profession in Nigeria, we respectfully request that the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee, in furtherance of its

mandate to uphold professional integrity among lawyers, investigate this matter thoroughly and consider appropriate disciplinary actions against Mr. Rimazonte Ezekiel.

We trust that you will consider this request seriously and take swift action to uphold the values and standards of the legal profession.

Yours sincerely,

 

Abiodun Baiyewu

Executive Director, Global Rights

#CSOs, Capacity Building

FAIR FINANCE SCHOOL NIGERIA EMPOWERED CSOs FOR CLIMATE JUSTICE

Leave a comment

By Smith Nwokocha

Group picture of Fair Finance School Nigeria Participants

A two-day workshop that has in attendance over 50 Civil Society Organizations including Climate Activists in Port Harcourt at Visa Karena Hotels on the 18th and 19th of October 2024.

The CSOs in attendance came from Lagos, Abuja, Delta, Bayelsa, Enugu, Imo State, Abia State, Akwa-Ibom and Rivers State.The Geo-Political regions of Nigeria were well represented.

 The Fair Finance School is a crucial initiative that empowers civil society and activists to responsibly engage with financial matters and advocate for social and environmental justice. The school encourages participants to actively contribute to the broader movement for fair and sustainable finance by fostering a common understanding of financial deals, institutions, and campaigning strategies. Through its Pan-African approach and focus on justice, the Fair Finance School seeks to bridge the gap between financial institutions and the people they affect, ultimately striving for a more equitable and informed financial landscape in Nigeria and across Africa.

Smith Nwokocha, Coordinator Quest For Growth and Development Foundation, moderating the sessions.

Day One:

The opening session was moderated by Smith Nwokocha, the convener of Fair Finance School Nigeria and Coordinator for Quest For Growth and Development Foundation. He recognized the Special Guest from NAFIL- Nigeria Airforce (Flight Lieutenant Joel Fakunle) and then introduced the first speaker Mr. Patrick Uduma, who shared his in-depth knowledge on the topic: “The Positionality of Finance”, further emphasised why Activists should care about Finance and Humanized Finance. It was quite interactive and engaging as participants were thrilled. Followed, the second speaker (Blessing Udofa Esq), who talked about Human Rights in Development and Climate Change with the sub-topic of Human Rights and Finance. The third speaker (Mrs Rita Kigbara) discussed in detail Climate Finance 101 with an emphasis on Accessing Climate Finance referencing experience and lessons from African NGOs in accessing International Climate Finance. What works and what doesn’t work.

Mr. Patrick Uduma Facilitated on The Positionality of Finance.

Your Story Matters Session (Presenting a Story-effects of Finance) by three Passionate Leaders in their Community shared Lived experiences through story-telling on the effect of Climate Finance in building solidarity.

HIS ROYAL EXCELLENCY, EZE IKEMBA 1 OF ETCHE LAND, RIVERS STATE (PROF. ENGR. AMB. PROMISE OBINNA ONYECHE); He shared a lived experience of the impact of Climate Change in the Niger Delta Region. The exploration of Oil and Gas in our communities by the International Oil Companies (IOCs) began to harm our eco-system and affectyyy the fertility of our soil. The effects of climate change are caused by human activities mainly, and it affects nature…Nature is serene, nature is peaceful and when you encroach on the serenity of nature, nature will react and if it does react, you can’t withhold it. The type of climate change impact in the Niger Delta is different from other parts of Nigeria.

HRE EZE IKEMBA1 of Ulakwo, Agwuruisi Ancient Kingdom of Etche Land (Prof. Engr. Amb. Promise Obinna ONYECHE). Shared Lived Experiences!

WENI KOKINOBO IGIRIGI: Living with Oil: Exploring the Lived Experiences of Indigenous Peoples in Bayelsa State. While there have been studies on the environmental, health and socio-economic impacts of artisanal refining in Southern Ijaw LGA, there is a lack of in-depth exploration of the lived experiences of individuals directly involved in artisanal refining in Kolo Creek, Ogbia LGA, Bayelsa State. Community Entry of Kpo-fire

“At first, people thought it was militants who were in the bush until a particular point we saw that they were cooking oil… it was some boys from Southern Ijaw that did it.” (IDI Oruma, 2024). Sex for Oil

“.. some women do sleep with the oga so they can get one or two bags to go and sell. That is what we heard…” (IDI Otuegwe II, 2024).

Recommendation:  

  • Economic diversification to reduce the region’s reliance on artisanal refining. Encouraging alternative economic activities, such as agriculture
  • Sustainability in the process of disrupting the artisanal refining process.
  • Environmental Education for communities and security agencies.
Weni Kokinobo Igirigi, shared Live Experiences!

GIFT SARO MEELUBARI: THE OGONI STORY: Climate Injustice and Environmental Degradation. A Land Once Rich and Fertile, Before Oil (Pre-1958): Ogoni Land was a place of abundant natural resources—fertile soil, clean rivers, and vibrant ecosystems. The people of Ogoni thrived on farming, fishing, and the bounty of the land. The land is Green with envy, enriching its people with life’s vitality. For generations, the Ogoni people lived in harmony with nature, passing down a heritage of respect for the environment. The Impact of Oil and Gas: Environmental Degradation. From Beauty to Destruction: The Effects of Fossil Fuels;

  • Oil Extraction / Impact on the Ogoni People: The Ogoni people, who depend on their land for sustenance, faced significant challenges as their environment deteriorated. Despite the extraction of over $30 billion worth of oil, they saw little benefit from these activities, leading to widespread discontent and activism
  • Oil Spills: Frequent oil spills poisoned the rivers, killing fish and making water unsafe to drink. Farmlands were destroyed, leaving communities with barren land and no means of survival.
  • Gas Flaring: The continuous burning of natural gas, or gas flaring, creates a toxic environment, pumping chemicals into the air and causing health crises.
  • Decades of Neglect (1990s-present): For decades, these environmental disasters were ignored. There were no cleanup efforts, no compensation, and no justice for the people of Ogoni. Even the said HYPREP CLEAN-UP is a no-story

This story of destruction is directly tied to the global conversation on climate finance. While oil companies reaped financial benefits, the people of Ogoni were left to suffer the consequences of environmental destruction without any form of climate finance to restore their land.

Gift Saro Meelubari , Shared Lived Experiences!

A PANEL SESSION: SHARING WORK FROM THE CONTINENT; The Panelists include: Mr.Kingsley Agu, Dr. Osaro Paul Aforji and Blessing Udofa Esq. Kingsley Agu a member of Fair Finance Coalition Nigeria, shared in detail the work of Fair Finance Coalition Nigeria and the impact so far. Then, Dr. Osaro Aforji pointed out the challenges faced by Aleto people in Eleme LGA in Rivers State, because of the Refinery situated in their community, the pollution and environmental degradation and oil spillage that have killed fishes in their Rivers. Finally, Blessing Udofa cap it up with Gender-responsiveness to climate change and protecting the Human Rights of Citizens affected by the impact of Climate Change, especially because of Oil and Gas Exploration in Communities in the Nger Delta.

Panel session: from right, Dr. Osaro Paul Aforji, Mrs. Blessing Udofa Esq, and Kingsley Agu

 Day Two:

Smith Nwokocha, welcomes participants to the second day of the Fair Finance School Nigeria, and he engages participants in a Bike Rack/Parking lot, where participants put questions on a bike rack. Quite an interesting discussion and brainstorming session.

Nwokocha introduced the first speaker for Day 2: Mrs. Noela Ugwu, who spoke on International Financial Institutions, why it matters, how they work and their relevance, including how to hold International Financial Institutions accountable through their Country’s Government. Subsequently, she had an engaging Q & A session with participants.

Mrs. Noela Ugwu, Facilitated on International Financial Institutions

The next Speaker Dr. Joseph Ekong represented by Mr. Smith Nwokocha, with a focused discussion on Community Engagement and Finance. Civil Society engagement processes/ the Nigerian experience in Community engagement, the legality and mechanism. Then, Mr. Smith Nwokocha grouped the participants into six groups and they were asked to identify three problem statements, Identify the stakeholders, the allies and targets and the groups arrived at a challenging but rewarding task.

The last speaker for the event, Mr Wisdom Nwokocha spoke on Campaigning and Ideas with sub-topics: Campaigning 101, Digital Campaigning and Engaging Traditional Media. He also did a practical session using participants’ social media to advance a campaign.

Finally, the participants were tasked in a group of six, to refine their ideas as a group, discuss three tactics to address the problems and discuss three actions to implement tactics and do a group presentation.

Participants were delighted to attend such a real-life -experience gathering workshop and the focus on Climate Finance and Activism makes it unique, as they look forward to stepping down the Fair Finance School Nigeria in their different locations.

Mr. Wisdom Nwokocha facilitated Campaigning and Ideas.
Group Presentation
Group presentation
Blessing Udofa Esq Facilitated on Human Rights in Development and Climate Change.
Mrs. Rita Kigbara , Facilitated on Climate Finance 101
Participants
From my right: Our Special Guest: Flight Lieutenant Joel Fakunle , Smith Nwokocha, and Usman N.
#CSOs, SDGS

PEACE CORPS OF NIGERIA, RIVERS STATE COMMAND CELEBRATES INTERNATIONAL DAY OF PEACE 2024🕊️

Leave a comment

By Smith Nwokocha

Rivers State Commandant (Dr. Michael Obiora) standing in the middle with Peace Corps Officers, Guest and Partner Organizations.

International Day of Peace  celebrated by PEACE CORPS OF NIGERIA!

On the 21st September 2024, Peace Corps of Nigeria, Rivers State Command observed the occasion.

The State Commandant (Dr. Michael Obiora) in his address, appreciates the National Commandant, PCN, Prof. A. O. Akoh FCITr, FCPA, FNINS.
The Guest Speaker, Dr. Osaro Paul Aforji. Partners of the Organization like Quest For Growth and Development  Foundation  for being present at the event of the Celebration.
Peace Corps Council (PCC) Rivers State.
23 LGA Commanders.
Officers and Men of Peace Corps of Nigeria, Rivers State Command.
Members of the Press.

He emphasized that in Commemorating this year’s International Day of Peace ️ with the theme; “Cultivating A Culture of Peace”, which serves as a powerful call to action, urging everyone to strive for a world where peace, justice and equality prevails.

In our world today, where conflicts and violence often dominate the headlines of newspapers and media, it is easy to lose sight of the progress the Peace Corps of Nigeria have made.

Dr. Michael Obiora, Peace Corps of Nigeria, Rivers State Commandant during his Address Speech!

The Peace Corps of Nigeria  having gotten Consultative Status with United Nations , is responding to the call of the Secretary General of the United Nation, to mark this year’s event in various States and localities. As we observe this day, the Rivers State Commandant honour the victims of war and violence across the globe and the Peace Corps of Nigeria recommit to promoting non-violence, dialogue and cooperation.

Together, let’s strive to build World where Peace is the guiding principle of our actions, and where every individual can live with dignity and respect. The International Day of Peace, observed annually holds significant importance which include but not limited to:
1. Promoting Global Ceasefire.
2. Fostering Dialogue and Reconciliation.
3. Supporting human rights which emphasizes on the importance of human rights, social justice and equality.
4. Reinforcing UN’s Mission by Aligning with the United Nation’s founding principles of promoting peace, security and cooperation.

Address by the Keynote speaker (Dr. Osaro Paul Aforji):

He started with some few quotes; “In vain we build the city , if we do not build the man”… Edwin Mark

#CSOs, Media, SDGS

CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS CONDEMN ASSAULT ON THE CIVIC SPACE BY THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION

Leave a comment

The undersigned civil society organizations are seriously disturbed by the alarming and troubling rate with which the ruling All-Progressive Congress (APC) government, under the leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has resorted to utilizing Nigeria’s security agencies as instruments of harassment, intimidation, and suppression against Labour groups and vocal civil society organizations (CSOs). This troubling trend raises serious questions about the state of democracy and human rights in Nigeria, as it appears to be a deliberate strategy aimed at stifling dissent and curtailing the voices of those who dare to challenge the status quo.

The actions of the government in this regard seem to be a calculated response to the growing discontent among the populace, which has been fuelled by widespread corruption, extravagant spending by those in power, and the implementation of policies that are increasingly detrimental to the well-being of ordinary Nigerians. These policies have not only exacerbated the existing socio-economic challenges but have also contributed to a climate of fear and repression, where legitimate grievances are met with force rather than dialogue.

Therefore, we condemn in strong terms possible the efforts of President Bola Tinubu’s administration to suppress dissent among citizens, restrict civil society, and undermine Nigeria’s civic environment. The actions taken by the government in recent weeks have raised serious concerns about the state of democracy and human rights in our nation. It is alarming to witness the increasing measures aimed at stifling voices that challenge the status quo, as well as the systematic targeting of organizations and individuals who advocate for transparency, accountability, and social justice.

We urge the prompt rectification of the numerous errors made in the past months, which have not only eroded public trust but have also created an atmosphere of fear and repression. It is imperative that the government acknowledges these missteps and takes immediate action to restore the rights and freedoms that are the cornerstone of a democratic society. This includes the retraction of any policies or actions that unjustly limit the ability of citizens to express their opinions, assemble peacefully, and engage in meaningful dialogue with their government.

Furthermore, we assert the necessity for the respect of constitutionally protected rights, including freedom of assembly and association, freedom of expression, and the principles of participatory governance. These rights are not merely privileges; they are fundamental to the functioning of a healthy democracy. Citizens must be allowed to gather, protest, and voice their concerns without fear of retribution. Civil society organizations play a crucial role in advocating for the needs and rights of the populace, and their work should be supported, not hindered.

Prior to September 9, 2024, analysts observing Nigeria’s civic environment would have rated the Bola Tinubu administration poorly regarding its efforts to safeguard and enhance press freedom, the right to associate, peaceful assembly, and self-expression. However, the events of September 9, 2024, marked a significant deterioration to an already bad situation for an administration that has increasingly demonstrated its willingness to suppress dissenting voices. In a manner reminiscent of Nigeria’s oppressive military regime, the Nigerian Government deployed agents from the Department of State Services to unlawfully arrest the leader of the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC), Comrade Joe Ajaero. Before we could fully comprehend the ramifications of this incident, we learned that agents from the same agency had also besieged the offices of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), a civil society organization working to advance the social, economic, and cultural rights of the Nigerian populace.

The Tinubu administration, which took office on May 29, 2023, has been marked by a troubling pattern of neglect towards the concerns and aspirations of large segments of the Nigerian population. This administration appears to be following a path similar to that of its predecessor, the Buhari administration, which was widely criticized for its failure to safeguard the civic space and uphold democratic principles. The current government seems intent on not only maintaining but potentially exacerbating the shortcomings of the Buhari regime, raising serious concerns about the state of democracy and human rights in Nigeria.

One of the most alarming developments under the Tinubu administration is the alarming frequency with which journalists are being targeted. Reports indicate that these individuals are being abducted from their homes and subjected to various forms of harassment on an almost daily basis. This systematic targeting occurs merely because they are exercising their constitutional duty to hold the government accountable to the citizens. Such actions not only undermine press freedom but also create a climate of fear that stifles dissent and discourages critical reporting on government actions.

The situation escalated dramatically when Nigerians took to the streets last month to peacefully protest against the worsening economic conditions and escalating insecurity in the country. Instead of engaging with the citizens and addressing their grievances, the Nigerian Police responded with excessive force. The deployment of tear gas and the unlawful detention of over 1,000 individuals during these protests exemplifies a troubling disregard for the right to peaceful assembly. Tragically, this brutal response resulted in at least 30 fatalities, highlighting the severe consequences of the government’s heavy-handed approach to dissent.

Moreover, the crackdown on dissent has extended to the arrest of minors, with several individuals aged between 14 and 17 facing treason charges. These young protesters, who were merely advocating for an end to bad governance under the #EndBadGovernance movement, are now entangled in a legal battle that could have devastating implications for their futures. This situation raises critical questions about the government’s commitment to upholding the rights of its citizens, particularly the youth, who are often the most vulnerable in times of political unrest.

On Tuesday, September 9, 2024, a significant new low was reached. The arrest of the NLC President and the almost simultaneous siege on the offices of SERAP, represents a threshold that should never be crossed in any nation that claims to uphold democratic principles. Democracy serves as a mechanism for participatory governance, functioning optimally when dissenters are permitted to lawfully contest the authorities in an environment where their rights are protected. This aligns with our Constitution, which guarantees citizens the right to assemble peacefully, associate freely, and express their views. Furthermore, the Constitution explicitly assigns the press the duty of ensuring government accountability.

It may be beneficial for the Tinubu administration to revisit the fundamental principles of democracy. A comprehensive review of these principles can provide a solid foundation for governance that is inclusive, transparent, and accountable to the citizens of Nigeria. In this context, we recommend that the administration thoroughly examine the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which serves as the supreme law of the land and outlines the rights and responsibilities of both the government and the citizens. This examination should not only focus on the constitutional provisions but also consider the historical and social contexts in which the Constitution was drafted and adopted.

Additionally, the administration should take into account the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which Nigeria has ratified. This charter emphasizes the importance of human rights, democracy, and good governance across the continent. By aligning its policies and practices with the principles enshrined in both the 1999 Constitution and the African Charter, the Tinubu administration can foster a political environment that respects individual freedoms, promotes social justice, and encourages active citizen participation in the democratic process.

In light of recent events, we strongly call upon the government and its security agencies to take the following actions:

 

  1. Immediately halt the unjust and illegal harassment of officials of the NLC.
  2. Provide a prompt and unconditional apology to the President of the NLC for his unlawful arrest and harassment.
  3. The DSS should also extend an unqualified apology for this unjust and audacious assault.
  4. Promptly release all peaceful demonstrators who were detained during the #EndBadGovernance protest, particularly ensuring the unconditional release of minors. Additionally, the treason charges against these individuals should be dropped immediately.
  5. The Nigerian government must direct its agencies and departments to implement a human rights-centered approach when addressing dissent, particularly during protests. A fundamental principle of the democratic framework we claim to uphold is the allowance of dissenting opinions.
  6. The callous and unwarranted harassment of civic actors like Omoyele Sowore should end. Nigerians should not be harassed because they choose to exercise their right to freedom of expression in a manner that the government finds unpalatable.
  7. President Tinubu should initiate a dialogue involving civil society organizations, media representatives, and professional groups in Nigeria.
     

We caution that neglecting the responsibilities will only exacerbate the struggles of Nigerians, who are already burdened by a severely mismanaged economy. It conveys to the international community that residing in “Africa’s Largest Democracy” is akin to existence under a dictatorship. It is the Government’s guaranteed ticket to both national and international embarrassment.

The period characterized by the oppressive measures of dictatorship ended in 1999. Such an era is not endorsed by Nigeria’s constitution and fails to meet the aspirations of the Nigerian populace, thereby lacking legitimacy.

Signed:

  • RULAAC – Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre
  • Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA Resource Centre)
  • Resource Centre for Human Rights and Civic Education (CHRICED)
  • Centre for Information Technology and Development (CITAD)
  • African Centre for Media & Information Literacy (AFRICMIL)
  • Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC)
  • BudgIT Foundation
  • Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa (CAPPA)
  • State of the Union (SOTU)
  • Tax Justice and Governance Platform
  • Transition Monitoring Group (TMG)
  • Women in Media Communication Initiative (WIM)
  • Zero Corruption Coalition (ZCC)
  • Emma Ezeazu Centre for Good Governance and Accountability
  • Centre Democracy and Development (CDD)
  • Accountability Lab, Nigeria
  • Centre for Journalism Innovation and Development (CJID}
  • Say NO Campaign – Nigeria
  • Femi Falana Chamber
  • Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF)
  • Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP)
  • Good Governance Team
  • 21st Century Community Empowerment for Youth Initiative
  • Organization for Community Civic Engagement (OCCEN)
  • Mothers and Marginalised Advocacy Centre (MAMA Centre)
  • Social Action
  • Centre for Transparency Watch
  • West Africa Civil Society Forum WASCSOF
  • Global Rights
  • African Centre for Leadership, Strategy & Development (Centre LSD)
  • Partners West Africa
  • Order Paper
  • Say No Campaign
  • Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth, Nigeria. ERA
  • Center for Fiscal Transparency and Public Integrity
  • Amnesty International Nigeria
  • Borno Coalition for Democracy and Progress (BOCODEP)
  • Connected Development (CODE)
  • Centre for Democratic Research and Training (CRDDERT)
  • Praxis
  • CLEEN Foundation
  • Spaces for Change
  • Abuja School of Social and Political Thought
  • Yiaga Africa
  • Policy Alert
  • Socio Economic Research and Development Centre
  • Procurement Observation and Advocacy Initiative
  • Media Rights Agenda
  • Media Initiative for Transparency in Extractive industries (MITEI)
  • Centre for Social Centre for Justice Reform
  • Centre for Community Empowerment in conflict and Peace building -Kaduna
  • Centre for Global Tolerance and Human Rights
  • Open Society on Justice Reform Project
  • Environmental Rights Action
  • Sesor Empowerment Foundation
  • World Impact Development Foundation
  • Human Rights Social Development and Environmental Foundation
  • Elixir Trust Foundation
  • Prisoners’ Rehabilitation and Welfare Action (PRAWA)
  • Women’s Rights Advancement and Protection Alternative
  • (WRAPA)
  • Community Life Project (CLP)
  • Women in Mining,Nigeria
  • Kebetkache Women Development & Resource Centre
  • Women Advocate Research and Documentation Centre (WARDC)
  • Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice (ANEEJ)
  • Conscience for Human Rights and Conflict Resolution (CHRCR)
  • Lawyers Alert
  • Nigeria Network of NGOs
  • INVICTUS AFRICA
#CSOs, Advocacy, Climate Change, Oil and Gas, Renewable Energy, SDGS

GLOBAL WEEK OF ACTION FOR CLIMATE FINANCE AND A FOSSIL-FREE FUTURE 2024

Leave a comment

By Smith Nwokocha

Starting Sept 13 – Sept 20 Actions

#PayUp for Climate Finance

We will end the week with Climate Finance actions. We
urge groups and people’s movements to flood the streets and declare the need
for Climate Finance as dire and immediate. Governments of the Global
North must heed the people rising, demanding at least $5 trillion per year. The
constant denial of obligations is unacceptable. Adequate, public and non-debt-creating
climate finance is urgently needed for mitigation, adaptation, loss and damage
and a just energy transition.

OUR COMMON DEMANDS

1.
Global
North governments provide at least US$5 trillion per year to the Global South
in public finance. This amount must be revised upwards regularly as needed and
be considered as merely an initial payment toward the much larger total climate
debt owed by the Global North.
2.
Adequate climate finance that covers needs for
mitigation, adaptation, loss and damage and just transition
3.
Climate Finance must be public and should not be
driven by profit intrinsic to private investments and corporations
4.
New and additional climate finance contributions on
top of the existing financial commitments of the Global North such as ODAs,
multilateral and bilateral aids, etc.
5.
Non-debt creating climate finance that will not
lead to further exacerbation of the existing debt burden of the Global South
6.
Predictable climate finance that will ensure that
resources are available when and where they are needed most and avoid further
delays in implementing urgent actio
7.
Climate Finance that is channelled through
democratic, transparent and accountable mechanisms and NOT via the existing or
new structures where the Global North dominates governance and designs policies
favouring their geopolitical and economic interests.
8.
Global North governments to tax the
polluters and profiteers and end public subsidies for fossil fuels in
order to mobilise adequate climate finance

CLIMATE FINANCE ESCALATION CAMPAIGN 2024

BACKGROUND PAPER

for consideration of various CSO constituencies in the
climate justice arena and of the wider social movement.

Why must we escalate our efforts this year?

The frequency and intensity of climate catastrophes are
skyrocketing, causing devastating economic and social impacts, especially in
the most vulnerable regions. Decades of inaction and broken promises by the
governments of the Global North have not only compounded these losses but have
also deepened the gross inequalities and injustices endured by communities,
economies, and ecosystems.

This year is a pivotal year for Climate Finance. At COP29 in
Baku, critical decisions will be made to address the soaring costs of urgent
climate action. This year presents crucial political moments that will either
propel us toward the radical transformation needed in our social, economic, and
political systems or doom us to further climate chaos. Delay is no longer an
option— we need to unite and increase pressure on all fronts to ensure decisive
action.

What is the climate debt the Global North owes to the
Global South?

The Global North has an incalculable climate debt owed to
the Global South, stemming from their historical and ongoing greenhouse gas
emissions that have caused and will continue to cause massive losses and
damages. There is a historical, ethical and legal responsibility of
the Global North to repay this debt with urgency based on their fair shares, as
part of a larger historical and continuing social, economic, and ecological
debt owed to the Global South, arising from centuries of exploitation and
inequity.

What do we want?

To begin addressing this climate debt, we demand the governments
of the Global North to provide at least US$5 trillion per year to the
Global South in public finance. The said amount must be revised upwards
regularly as needed, and be considered as merely an initial payment, toward the
much larger total climate debt that continues to accrue. It is important to
emphasize that the current climate debt is immense and incalculable. This payment
provides a realistic, attainable figure for governments of the Global North to
deliver as a starting point in addressing the urgent and rising climate needs
of the Global South.

What is the basis for the US$5 trillion/year ask?

Several studies suggest that the annual finance needed ranges from US$2.3 – US$10 trillion. For example, using the figure of $192 Trillion until 2050, the annual average from 2023 (when the study was released) to 2025 is over US$6.85 Trillion a year. Recognizing that the amounts are all underestimated, we forward the demand that the Global North collectively deliver US$5 trillion
annually as climate debt. This figure does not include the necessary and
appropriate investments that the private sector must provide as part of their responsibility.

Is US$5 trillion per year attainable?

The Global North’s claim of insufficient resources for
development and climate finance is fundamentally flawed and disingenuous. During the COVID-19 pandemic, these governments mobilized an astounding US$16
trillion in fiscal stimulus to support their economies. Additionally, the
G7 spent over US$1 trillion annually funding wars and conflicts globally. This clearly demonstrates that the resources exist—they are just being allocated based on political will and priorities. If trillions can be found for pandemic relief and military expenditures, the same financial commitment must be made to
address the existential threat of climate change.

Is the US$5 trillion the number we demand for New
Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG)?

No. The US$5 trillion per year is an initial payment towards
the climate debt owed to the Global South and serves as a critical barometer for discussions on the scale of the new collective quantified goal (NCQG) on
climate finance. The climate debt is the moral framing for the new climate
finance goal, which has to be needs-based, with a core of public grant-based finance.

What kind of Climate Finance do we need?

In light of the NCQG discussions, it is important to
emphasize that the delivery of Climate Finance, as part of the payment for
climate debt, must be:

✅PUBLIC and should not
be driven by profit intrinsic to private investments and corporations

✅NEW & ADDITIONAL
to existing financial commitments of the Global North such as ODAs,
multilateral and bilateral aids, etc

✅NON-DEBT CREATING and
must not lead to the further exacerbation of the existing debt burden of the
Global South

✅ADEQUATE & PREDICTABLE
to ensure that resources are available when and where they are needed most and
avoid further delays in implementing urgent action

✅COVERS NEEDS FOR MITIGATION,
ADAPTATION, LOSS & DAMAGE, AND JUST TRANSITION

✅CHANNELED THROUGH DEMOCRATIC,
TRANSPARENT AND ACCOUNTABLE MECHANISMS and NOT via the existing or
new structures where the Global North dominates governance and designs policies
favouring their geopolitical and economic interests.

When do we want to raise this?

We suggest (digitally) launching this piece of the global #PayUp campaign around the Heads of Delegation retreat happening in Baku, from July 25 to 28. We see this as a good opportunity to raise the bar of ambition high and enshrine the negotiations around the future climate finance goal in this moral framing and reflect the responsibility of the Global North to pay its climate debt to the Global South. This milestone of the Finance Escalation
is aimed to be complemented by various other moments of action and campaigns, including a Global Day of Action in September during the period of the UNGA and the Summit of the Future.

In Nigeria, Smith Nwokocha, Coordinator, of Quest For Growth
and Development Foundation will be hosting an in-person Community Event (Townhall Engagement) at Oroworukwu Community Phalga LGA Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Niger Delta, Nigeria on Friday the 20th of September, 2024.

https://payupandphaseout.org/sept20/

#Health, Climate Change, SDGS

EMBRACING ONE HEALTH IN 21ST CENTURY ERA!

Leave a comment

By Smith Nwokocha

HOW MUCH DO YOU KNOW OF “ONE HEALTH”?

One Health is an integrated, unifying approach that aims to
sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems.

It recognizes that the health of humans, domestic and wild
animals, plants, and the wider environment (including ecosystems) are closely
linked and interdependent.

While health, food, water, energy and environment are all
wider topics with sector-specific concerns, the collaboration across sectors
and disciplines contribute to protecting health, addressing health challenges
such as the emergence of infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance, and
food safety and promoting the health and integrity of our ecosystems.

By linking humans, animals and the environment, One Health
can help to address the full spectrum of disease control – from prevention to
detection, preparedness, response and management – and contribute to global
health security.

The approach can be applied at the community, subnational,
national, regional and global levels, and relies on shared and effective
governance, communication, collaboration and coordination. Having the One
Health approach in place makes it easier for people to better understand the
co-benefits, risks, trade-offs and opportunities to advance equitable and
holistic solutions…..World Health Organization

Key facts

  • The health of humans, animals, and ecosystems are closely interlinked. Changes
    in these relationships can increase the risk of new human and animal
    diseases developing and spreading.
  • The close links between human, animal and environmental health demand close
    collaboration, communication and coordination between the relevant
    sectors.
  • One Health is an approach to optimize the health of humans, animals and
    ecosystems by integrating these fields, rather than keeping them separate.
  • Some 60% of emerging infectious diseases that are reported globally come from
    animals, both wild and domestic. Over 30 new human pathogens have been
    detected in the last 3 decades, 75% of which have originated in animals.
  • Human activities and stressed ecosystems have created new opportunities for
    diseases to emerge and spread.
  • These stressors include animal trade, agriculture, livestock farming,
    urbanization, extractive industries, climate change, habitat fragmentation
    and encroachment into wild areas.

Overview

One Health is an integrated, unifying approach to balance
and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems. It uses the close, interdependent links among these fields to create new surveillance and disease control methods.

For example, the way land is used can impact the number of
malaria cases. Weather patterns and human-built water controls can affect
diseases like dengue. Trade in live, wild animals can increase the likelihood of infectious diseases jumping over to people (called disease spillover).

The COVID-19 pandemic put a spotlight on the need for a
global framework for improved surveillance and a more holistic, integrated
system. Gaps in One Health knowledge, prevention and integrated approaches were
seen as key drivers of the pandemic. By addressing the linkages between human, animal and environmental health, One Health is seen as a transformative
approach to improved global health.

One Health applies to a range of issues, including: 

  • antimicrobial
    resistance (AMR), which happens when germs like bacteria and parasites
    develop the ability to defeat the drugs designed to kill them and continue
    growing and spreading;
  • zoonotic
    diseases, which are infectious diseases that are caused by germs that
    spread between animals and people, such as Ebola, avian influenza, rabies,
    etc.; 
  • vector-borne
    diseases, which affect people who get bitten by a vector (mosquitoes,
    ticks, lice and fleas) and include dengue fever, West Nile virus,
    Lyme disease and malaria; 
  • food
    safety and foodborne diseases, caused by contamination of food and occur
    at any stage of the food production, delivery and consumption chain, such
    as norovirus, salmonella, listeria, etc.; and 
  • environmental
    health, such as water pollution, air pollution and climate change. 

According to the World Bank, the expected benefit of One
Health to the global community was estimated in 2022 to be at least US$ 37
billion per year. The estimated annual need for expenditure on prevention is
less than 10% of these benefits.

Since 2003, the world has seen over 15 million human deaths
and US$ 4 trillion in economic losses due to disease and pandemics, as well as immense losses from food and water safety hazards, which are one health-related
health threat. 

Collaboration across sectors and disciplines through a One Health approach is a vital solution for addressing the complex health
challenges facing our society. To prevent, detect and respond to emerging health challenges, all relevant sectors must collaborate in an integrated manner to achieve together what no sector can achieve alone.

Scope of the problem

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that caused COVID-19
has underlined the need to strengthen the One Health approach, with a greater emphasis on connections to animal health and the environment (see the WHO Manifesto for a healthy recovery from COVID-19). Attempting to save money by neglecting environmental protection, emergency preparedness, health systems,
water and sanitation infrastructure, and social safety nets has proven to be a false economy, and the bill is now being paid many times over.

We now have an unprecedented opportunity to strengthen
collaboration and policies across these many areas and reduce the risk of future pandemics and epidemics while also addressing the ongoing burden of endemic and non-communicable diseases.

Surveillance that monitors risks and helps identify patterns
across these many areas is needed. In addition, new research should
integrate the impact of these different fields, particularly on the drivers
that leads to crises.

Challenges

To implement One Health, major structural changes are
required to integrate the human, animal and environmental health fields and support multi-sectoral communication, collaboration, coordination, and capacity
strengthening.

Critical gaps in One Health implementation include:

  • databases
    and resources to support information sharing and action in line with a One
    Health approach;
  • identification
    and showcasing of best practice examples for One Health implementation;
  • mapping
    of existing initiatives and capacities for One Health research and building the next-generation One Health workforce;
  • a model for an integrated One Health surveillance system;
  • mechanisms for routine and emergency coordination with relevant stakeholders;
  • a more complete understanding of the drivers of spillover of zoonotic diseases (transmitted between animals and humans). This includes animal trade,
    agriculture, livestock farming, urbanization and habitat
    fragmentation;
  • a standardized approach for assessing risks of spillover of pathogens between different animal populations and humans, and the emergence of zoonotic diseases, including those arising in food systems; and
  • methods for identifying and reducing spillover risks and spread of zoonotic diseases in ways that minimize trade-offs and maximize co-benefits with other health and sustainable development objectives.

WHO response

WHO is integrating One Health across its units and offices,
providing strategic advice relating to policy, and conducting training at the
local, national and regional levels. The goal is stronger programmes that are
led and owned by countries.

WHO is a member of the One Health Quadripartite with the
Food and Agriculture Organization, the World Organisation for Animal
Health and the United Nations Environment Programme. Together, they have developed a One Health Joint Plan of Action that includes a set of activities
that the 4 organizations can do together, including working with political leaders to establish the needed infrastructure and funding.

WHO is the secretariat for the One Health High-Level Expert
Panel (OHHLEP), which provides scientific advice to the Quadripartite partners on One Health priority setting, policies and strategies. This includes recommendations on good practice guidelines, a model One Health Surveillance
System, a comprehensive list of upstream drivers of zoonotic disease spillover and recommendations to mitigate these risks.

REFERENCE/SOURCE:

https://www.who.int/health-topics/one-health#tab=tab_1

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/one-health

Gender Based Violence, SDGS

STAKEHOLDERS PUSH BACK AGAINST NIGERIAN SENATE: ‘AMEND, DON’T REPEAL’ VAPP ACT 2015

Leave a comment

By Ejiro Umukoro

. . . The current VAPP Act 2015 is sufficient. What it requires is an amendment, not a repeal as more stakeholders reject Senator’s Jibrin Isah’s bill to repeal the VAPP Act in the FCT.

In a shocking move, the Nigerian Senate has secretly initiated the repeal of the Violence Against Persons Prohibition (VAPP) Act, a bill passed in 2015 to protect marginalized female folks in society. Stakeholders have unanimously condemned this move, citing suspicious motives and a lack of transparency.

The VAPP Act was introduced by the Goodluck Jonathan administration’s four days to the end of his tenure in office before he handed over to President Buhari in 2015 to provide support and justice for victims of violence. However, the current repeal effort has raised concerns among stakeholders, who argue that the bill’s flaws can be addressed through amendments rather than a complete repeal.

During an emergency meeting organised by Women Advocates Research and Documentation Centre (WARDC) in collaboration with members of the civil society, non-governmental organizations and the media, including Womanifesto, Techher and LightRay! Media criticized the secrecy surrounding the repeal, questioning the motives behind it.

Hassana Maina, the Lead at Anti-Sexual Violence Lead Support Initiative, (ASVIOL) asked, “Why the secrecy in repealing the VAAP Act? And why are they repealing the bill?” She also questioned the unwillingness of Senator Jibrin Isah’s in engaging members of the civil society, especially women-led organisations who are directly affected by the VAPP Act. She cautioned against the speedy attempt by the law-making institution that refused stakeholders input from across the country in the passage of the Repeal of VAPP Act when there are sufficient data and case studies to prove the efficiency of the VAPP Act 2015 since its passage by the 9th assembly.

The stakeholders identified several issues with the original VAPP Act, including hurried passage, defects in the law, wrong references to the constitution, low fine fees for offenders, etc., they however, emphasized that these issues can be addressed through amendments rather than a repeal.

Dorothy Njemanze, ED, Dorothy Njemanze Foundation raised concern on the increase of the number of women who are the recipients of violence on a daily basis, adding that outstanding court cases will be threatened if VAPP Act is repealed as issues of public spaces are already defined, emphasing that there is no justification for revocation or annulment of the existing act.

An analysis of the proposed repeal bill revealed significant differences from the original VAPP Act, including:

Renaming of the Act
Introduction of gender-neutral language
Provisions inimical to the Act’s objectives
Stakeholders argued that these changes undermine the Act’s purpose and protections for women.

Dr. Abiola Akiyode-Afolabi, Executive Director, (WARDC), emphasized that the VAPP Act is already operative in the FCT and 36 states, and repealing it would negate its successes. She therefore called for a section-by-section analysis of the law to identify areas for improvement. However, she emphasised that existing VAPP Act that has been domesticated in other states in Nigeria are not affected by the current bill for a repeal of the VAPP. She clarified that the VAPP Act Repeal is strictly for the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Abuja, exclusive of other states. “We need everyone to have this clarity. The VAPP Act Repeal is for the FCT in Abuja, and not across other states in Nigeria.”

Dr Kemi DaSilva, ED, Women At Risk Foundation (WARIF) agrees with Dr. Afolabi-Akiode on current content of the VAPP Act as being sufficient enough requiring line-by-line analysis for an amendment, but not a repeal, as this is tantamount to throwing away the baby and the bath water. She explains: “We are pushing back.
VAPP Act needs review, no doubt, but beyond emotional reaction, based on the historical aspect of the past, we need to focus on specific areas already highlighted and see where amendments are needed”, she emphasised.

It would be noted that since 2015 to 2024, there has been high number of domestication violence across states, and especially more so since the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown till date.

The Moderator of the VAPP Act analysis, Lady Ejiro Umukoro, ED LightRay! Media, called on the need to have legislative aides working with senators and house of representatives be properly trained on how to write draft title of bills, language used in the content of bills, ans how to engage stakeholders and their input into lawmaking. While she commended the addition of a more definition of what consent means, she buttressed the importance of having the critical voices of women be reflected in the act that has a direct impact on women’s lives, health and survival.

Former ActionAid Nigeria Country Director, Ene Obi emphasised the need to have a follow-up stakeholders engagement with Senator Jibrin Isah from Kogi State on the need for an amendment and not a repeal as well as during the public hearing.

Other stakeholders highlighted the need for data on successful case studies under the VAPP Act, engagement with civil society, and institutional involvement in the amendment process in a more transparent and accountable manner.

In conclusion, stakeholders unanimously rejected the repeal of the VAPP Act, calling for amendments to address its flaws rather than a complete repeal. They vowed to amplify their efforts to protect the rights of marginalized female folks in society.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started